
Between the recent riots in Lhasa, the elections in Taiwan, and the alleged terrorist activities in Xinjiang, it's been a turbulent last few weeks in China. There's been some good reporting about this from US newspapers and magazines, but the blogs of Westerners living in China have done an outstanding job of gathering information and thinking hard about these issues. I don't have much that I can add to what they have already said. For anyone wanting to find out more, I'll put some links at the bottom of this post to the sites that have been the most helpful to me.
I do want to share a few stories about talks I've had with Chinese people about these issues. It's probably hard for people in America to understand why most Chinese accept their government's version of what's happened, or why they buy into the image of China as a country seeking social harmony and peaceful modernity. But if you stop for a moment and reflect, it shouldn't be that surprising. The image that citizens have of their own country is usually quite different from the image of that country that other people have, and reconciling that gap is never easy. Take, for example, the goals most Americans believe their country is pursuing in the Middle East versus the goals most Middle Easterners believe the Americans are pursuing there. Does anyone expect one side to convince the other of their perspective on that issue anytime soon?
But China is different-- the people here accept their country's version of events more wholeheartedly. Part of this has to do with access to information. If you can read fluently in English and have the technological access and knowledge to use the internet, (in other words, if you are a foreigner or super-priviledged then you can gain an outside perspective on events. On the other hand, if you're like most Chinese people then your access to media is the state-controlled newspapers or the state-controlled TV stations.
Yet there's more to the story. Even among the urban young, who do now, thanks to the Chinese government, speak some English and have some access to the net, there's very little questioning of Beijing's story. Most Chinese just don't trust Western media. For Americans, news releases from Chinese sources are disregarded as propaganda. For the Chinese, however, Western media is a tool of Western nations, who are in competition with China and don't want to see it succeed. From their perspective, Western media reports about bad things in China in order to hold back Chinese progress.
You can see how, with that kind of outlook, it doesn't matter how much outside information is available, because it is always discredited before it is heard. This brings me to a conversation I had recently with one of my teacher friends, someone who knows a fair amount about domestic and international affairs and even on occasion expresses frustration and dissatisfaction with the Chinese government.
ME: So, I've been wanting to ask you, what do you think about the problems happening in Tibet?
TEACHER: What have you read about them?
[I summarize Beijing's version of events, but then say I've read in Western media that the riots had popular support]
T: You shouldn't believe what you read in Western media. Were there any Westerners in Tibet at the time?
M: Well, very few, because the Chinese government prevented them from entering.
T: So where do you think the Western media got its information?
I tried to say that the media gathered its information from several indirect sources, but it wasn't getting anywhere. The teacher believed that Westerners were just listening to the Dalai Lama's version and that's all. He also felt the Tibetans were ungrateful for all the money China had invested in "modernizing" their country. In America, when we enter another region, our (stated) goal is always something like "freedom," where in China, the goal is "modernity." That says a lot about our different views of civilization.
Surprisingly, the Chinese people I talked to didn't seem to care that much about the Tibet issue, in contrast with all the attention it's received in the West. They were much more concerned about the Taiwanese election. Over the last week, the other Western teacher at the school and I have both had students asking us about what we thought about Taiwan. Both of us wisely declined discussing it. Taiwan is a huge issue for Chinese people. One week last term, the other Western teacher asked his students to draw maps of China. Every student, without fail, drew Taiwan as part of China. So to discuss Taiwan in our role as teachers is asking for trouble. However, I was having dinner recently with one of the students that I'm closest to, and she asked me about Taiwan. I decided to try the Socratic method, and the conversation went something like this:
STUDENT: Mr. Brent, what do you think about Taiwan?
ME: Well, I don't know much about Taiwan. What do you think?
S: I think Taiwan is part of China.
M: Do you think that people in Taiwan should be able to choose if they want to be part of China?
S: I think Taiwan is part of China.
M: But that wasn't my question. Should people in Taiwan be able to choose?
S: You know, there are a lot of people in Taiwan that want to be part of China.
M: If so many people in Taiwan want to be part of China, then why is there a problem?
S: . . . I don't know.
Did I get through? I doubt it. But you can see how much people accept the government's story, even to the point where it's hard for them to ask logical questions about that story.
I certainly hope things in China settle down. But with the Olympics getting closer, I'm worried it will just keep heating up. Let's hope someone on one side has the courage to try to understand the other's story.
Links:
www.beijingnewspeak.com/
Written by a Westerner who used to work for the Chinese state news agency, he has a great perspective on how propaganda in China operates.
http://news.imagethief.com/blogs/china/archive/2008/03/19/the-trouble-with-china-s-communication-about-tibet.aspx
More about the Chinese coverage of events.
http://www.zonaeuropa.com/weblog.htm/
Translations and commentary on Chinese blog postings and news releases about the events.
http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10875823/
The only Western journalist in Lhasa at the time of the riots.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/18/world/asia/18china.html
Good explanation of underlying causes of the recent riots.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/20/world/asia/20tibet.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Great article about ethnic inequalities in Tibet.














